Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Великобритания собралась защитить свою военную базу от Ирана14:46
Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00。体育直播对此有专业解读
const uint8_t *bytes = (const uint8_t *)[data bytes];，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Speaking at the company’s annual global leveraged-finance conference, Dimon warned inflation may prove to be the “skunk at the party.” The proverbial economic mephitidae is unlikely to be triggered by a conflict in the Middle East alone, said the Wall Street veteran, though the threat it poses increases the longer the military action drags on.，更多细节参见体育直播